Upstream has released updates that appears to apply and compile correctly.
This update has not been tested by PaperMC and as with ANY update, please do your own testing
Bukkit Changes:
da9ef3c5 #496: Add methods to get/set ItemStacks in EquipmentSlots
3abebc9f #492: Let Tameable extend Animals rather than Entity
941111a0 #495: Expose ItemStack and hand used in PlayerShearEntityEvent
4fe19cae #494: InventoryView - Add missing Brewing FUEL_TIME
CraftBukkit Changes:
933e9094 #664: Add methods to get/set ItemStacks in EquipmentSlots
18722312 #662: Expose ItemStack and hand used in PlayerShearEntityEvent
Upstream has released updates that appears to apply and compile correctly.
This update has not been tested by PaperMC and as with ANY update, please do your own testing
Bukkit Changes:
b999860d SPIGOT-2304: Add LootGenerateEvent
CraftBukkit Changes:
77fd87e4 SPIGOT-2304: Implement LootGenerateEvent
a1a705ee SPIGOT-5566: Doused campfires & fires should call EntityChangeBlockEvent
41712edd SPIGOT-5707: PersistentDataHolder not Persistent on API dropped Item
Upstream has released updates that appears to apply and compile correctly.
This update has not been tested by PaperMC and as with ANY update, please do your own testing
Bukkit Changes:
122289ff Add FaceAttachable interface to handle Grindstone facing in common with Switches
a6db750e SPIGOT-5647: ZombieVillager entity should have getVillagerType()
CraftBukkit Changes:
bbe3d58e SPIGOT-5650: Lectern.setPage(int) causes a NullPointerException
3075579f Add FaceAttachable interface to handle Grindstone facing in common with Switches
95bd4238 SPIGOT-5647: ZombieVillager entity should have getVillagerType()
4d975ac3 SPIGOT-5617: setBlockData does not work when NotPlayEvent is called by redstone current
Previous solution could still block network thread (while addPending is executing). This window is small, but removing it completely is better. This should probably also speed up concurrent adds, because no locking will be performed anymore.
The only possible downside is that adding elements one by one to synchronized list might be slower (But it's done while already locked, so maybe jvm will avoid additional locking?),
Aikar
Shane Freeder
Shevchik
Spottedleaf
MiniDigger