diff --git a/Spigot-Server-Patches/0274-Disable-Implicit-Network-Manager-Flushing.patch b/Spigot-Server-Patches/0274-Disable-Explicit-Network-Manager-Flushing.patch
similarity index 76%
rename from Spigot-Server-Patches/0274-Disable-Implicit-Network-Manager-Flushing.patch
rename to Spigot-Server-Patches/0274-Disable-Explicit-Network-Manager-Flushing.patch
index c1643bb0b..d416918fd 100644
--- a/Spigot-Server-Patches/0274-Disable-Implicit-Network-Manager-Flushing.patch
+++ b/Spigot-Server-Patches/0274-Disable-Explicit-Network-Manager-Flushing.patch
@@ -1,15 +1,15 @@
 From b7806469aa14552fea0aece2446419b9a96c27cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
 From: Aikar <aikar@aikar.co>
 Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 14:13:33 -0400
-Subject: [PATCH] Disable Implicit Network Manager Flushing
+Subject: [PATCH] Disable Explicit Network Manager Flushing
 
 This seems completely pointless, as packet dispatch uses .writeAndFlush.
 
-Things seem to work fine without implicit flushing, but incase issues arise,
+Things seem to work fine without explicit flushing, but incase issues arise,
 provide a System property to re-enable it using improved logic of doing the
 flushing on the netty event loop, so it won't do the flush on the main thread.
 
-Renable flushing by passing -Dpaper.implicit-flush=true
+Renable flushing by passing -Dpaper.explicit-flush=true
 
 diff --git a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/NetworkManager.java b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/NetworkManager.java
 index b93a26e8f..da7c45697 100644
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ index b93a26e8f..da7c45697 100644
      // Paper start - NetworkClient implementation
      public int protocolVersion;
      public java.net.InetSocketAddress virtualHost;
-+    private static boolean enableImplicitFlush = Boolean.getBoolean("paper.implicit-flush");
++    private static boolean enableExplicitFlush = Boolean.getBoolean("paper.explicit-flush");
      // Paper end
  
      public NetworkManager(EnumProtocolDirection enumprotocoldirection) {
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ index b93a26e8f..da7c45697 100644
  
          if (this.channel != null) {
 -            this.channel.flush();
-+            if (enableImplicitFlush) this.channel.eventLoop().execute(() -> this.channel.flush()); // Paper - we don't need to implicit flush here, but allow opt in incase issues are found to a better version
++            if (enableExplicitFlush) this.channel.eventLoop().execute(() -> this.channel.flush()); // Paper - we don't need to explicit flush here, but allow opt in incase issues are found to a better version
          }
  
      }