core
/
testserver
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
testserver/Spigot-Server-Patches/0385-Use-ChunkStatus-cache-...

29 lines
1.4 KiB
Diff
Raw Normal View History

Houston, we got a patch (#2731) * Houston, we got a patch * is this the end of the beginning or the beginning of the end
2019-12-12 16:20:43 +00:00
From dc460bf237dd914ca9485c60ffde346f290fa9fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
Optimize protochunk saving (#2218) Use a chunk status cache to check if we could potentially overwrite a levelchunk. The check could be entirely elided at the risk of overwriting chunk data, however most protochunks should have their corresponding regionfile loaded with their chunk status.
2019-06-22 20:17:40 +00:00
From: Spottedleaf <Spottedleaf@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 04:20:47 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Use ChunkStatus cache when saving protochunks
The cache should contain the chunk status when saving. If not it
will load it.
diff --git a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/PlayerChunkMap.java b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/PlayerChunkMap.java
Houston, we got a patch (#2731) * Houston, we got a patch * is this the end of the beginning or the beginning of the end
2019-12-12 16:20:43 +00:00
index 4379434f6..93729eea2 100644
Optimize protochunk saving (#2218) Use a chunk status cache to check if we could potentially overwrite a levelchunk. The check could be entirely elided at the risk of overwriting chunk data, however most protochunks should have their corresponding regionfile loaded with their chunk status.
2019-06-22 20:17:40 +00:00
--- a/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/PlayerChunkMap.java
+++ b/src/main/java/net/minecraft/server/PlayerChunkMap.java
Houston, we got a patch (#2731) * Houston, we got a patch * is this the end of the beginning or the beginning of the end
2019-12-12 16:20:43 +00:00
@@ -775,8 +775,10 @@ public class PlayerChunkMap extends IChunkLoader implements PlayerChunk.d {
Optimize protochunk saving (#2218) Use a chunk status cache to check if we could potentially overwrite a levelchunk. The check could be entirely elided at the risk of overwriting chunk data, however most protochunks should have their corresponding regionfile loaded with their chunk status.
2019-06-22 20:17:40 +00:00
NBTTagCompound nbttagcompound;
if (chunkstatus.getType() != ChunkStatus.Type.LEVELCHUNK) {
- nbttagcompound = this.readChunkData(chunkcoordintpair);
- if (nbttagcompound != null && ChunkRegionLoader.a(nbttagcompound) == ChunkStatus.Type.LEVELCHUNK) {
+ // Paper start - Optimize save by using status cache
Fix loadChunk(x, z, false) I was not correctly checking if the status was even cached. Actually fix it this time Do not forget about the async chunk placeholder Actually fix it this time I hope No plugin tickets for getChunkAtGen(x, z, boolean) Change ChunkStatus ABI This is required for asynchronous IO. async io will require calls to getChunkStatusIfCached to return the chunk status for a chunk currently queued to save - this cannot be reasonably done with current ABI
2019-07-08 06:52:08 +00:00
+ ChunkStatus statusOnDisk = this.getChunkStatusOnDisk(chunkcoordintpair);
Optimize protochunk saving (#2218) Use a chunk status cache to check if we could potentially overwrite a levelchunk. The check could be entirely elided at the risk of overwriting chunk data, however most protochunks should have their corresponding regionfile loaded with their chunk status.
2019-06-22 20:17:40 +00:00
+ if (statusOnDisk != null && statusOnDisk.getType() == ChunkStatus.Type.LEVELCHUNK) {
+ // Paper end
return false;
}
--
Houston, we got a patch (#2731) * Houston, we got a patch * is this the end of the beginning or the beginning of the end
2019-12-12 16:20:43 +00:00
2.24.1
Optimize protochunk saving (#2218) Use a chunk status cache to check if we could potentially overwrite a levelchunk. The check could be entirely elided at the risk of overwriting chunk data, however most protochunks should have their corresponding regionfile loaded with their chunk status.
2019-06-22 20:17:40 +00:00